Anatomy of ABS wings (F-Toys 777 and 787 edition) - Wings900 Discussion Forums Wings900 - Model News

Go Back   Wings900 Discussion Forums > Wings900 Model Terminal > 1:500 Scale Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 07-25-2019, 12:07 AM   #1
RJ Second Officer
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 161
ragefury32 is appreciatedragefury32 is appreciatedragefury32 is appreciatedragefury32 is appreciatedragefury32 is appreciatedragefury32 is appreciatedragefury32 is appreciated
Anatomy of ABS wings (F-Toys 777 and 787 edition)

Does anyone know why the 777 is such a favorite for model makers like F-Toys?
Take this for example:



Early 777-200 from F-Toys Wing Collection 1 - 2006 : Note printings for the cargo hatches. JA701A is the functional twin of the JA8197 that is in my collection (JA8197, 777 line number 9 is the ANA 777 EIS model).



Relatively recent 777-300 from ANA Wing Collection 4 - 2012.



Well, let's put it this way. Here are 4 wings I pulled from 4 of my models. A 777-200ER, a 777-300, a 777-300ER, and a 777-200. Can you guess the difference?



Well, that's a bit of a trick question. The 777 series uses the same wing amongst the classics (777-200/200ER/300). The later developments (777-200LR/300ER) with the raked wingtips were a modification of the same wing.



(JA708J is the 777-200ER and JA751J is the 300).



And here's a look of just the 777-300 (JA8941) versus the 777300ER (7A737J). Both are JAL machines.

In fact, you can model the entire existing 777 range using one set of tailplanes, one set of fin, 2 fuselage lengths and 2 wings (one with the regular and one with the raked wingtips)

777-200 - Original wing, short fuselage
777-200ER - Original wing, short fuselage
777-300 - Original wing, long fuselage
777-300ER - Raked wingtip wing, long fuselage
777-200LR - Raked wingtip wing, short fuselage

What about the 787?



Well, F-Toys do not have a 787-9, but it's probably not difficult to make a resin 787-10 fuselage, cut about 11mm from the length of the fuselage (it's about 6mm starting from a cut in front of the 2nd door and 5mm aft of the 3rd), or take a resin cast 787-8 fuselage, cut it right in front of the second door and one window right after the 3rd, and then add a 6.1mm plug (enough for 5 rows of windows) behind each cut. That would make it a 787-9.



I should mention that the wings and horizontal stabilizers are exactly the same, the engine pylons are pretty much externally identical in 1:500, while the fin is very slightly taller, so slight that it will not show up at 1:500 scale.



So here's an ANA 787-8 versus a JAL 787-8. The only difference? One is from ANA WC4 (March 2012) while the other is from JAL WC4 (September 2012). The SQ 787-10 is from September 2018.






Do note that in all cases, the ANA has superior prints (RR logo on the engine pylon, Boeing/Dreamliner logo on the fuselage), and both the ANA/JAL 787-8s have substantially better landing gear.
ragefury32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 AM.

Latest Threads
- by Charter
- by airboed
- by IwanT
 

Models of the Week
 


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

 

SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2