herpa's 1:1000 airport - Page 2

United747 · 10-30-2006, 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WN737

You have to remember these are in 1:100 scale. That's 1/2 the size of Herpas 1:500 scale models. It's hard to get every detail when you're working with an extremely small scale.

Actually it's 1:1000 scale but who would want to buy those? There so small and very ugly.

WN737 · 10-30-2006, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by United747

Actually it's 1:1000 scale but who would want to buy those? There so small and very ugly.

Yes, I meant 1:1000, that was a typo.

I personally have no interest in these but I'm sure others do.

United747 · 10-30-2006, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WN737

Yes, I meant 1:1000, that was a typo.

I personally have no interest in these but I'm sure others do.

Well some people who want a fast airport with unlimited space proboly and a cheap price who don't care about quality.

a_loser · 10-30-2006, 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by United747

Yah I could have.

Great! When you can prove it I'll believe you

United747 · 10-30-2006, 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by a_loser

Great! When you can prove it I'll believe you

How is this?

Those planes are really ugly they could have done better on them.

a_loser · 10-30-2006, 10:54 PM

No no no, you're changing the subject (again) - I asked whether you can make a better 1:1000 display, and you said yes you can. Now I'm requesting that you prove it.

United747 · 10-30-2006, 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by a_loser

No no no, you're changing the subject (again) - I asked whether you can make a better 1:1000 display, and you said yes you can. Now I'm requesting that you prove it.

AHHHHHH I didn't mean 1:1000 airport when you said I could do better I thought meant spelling my bad

a_loser · 10-30-2006, 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by United747

AHHHHHH I didn't mean 1:1000 airport when you said I could do better I thought meant spelling my bad

Well, your spelling seems to be a work in progress, so I thought I'd give you the benefit of the doubt on that one

As to the airport, that's why I thought I'd clarify - I figured something got lost in the translation (or something like that)

n777co · 10-30-2006, 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by a_loser

No no no, you're changing the subject (again) - I asked whether you can make a better 1:1000 display, and you said yes you can. Now I'm requesting that you prove it.

I with you on this one!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by United747

AHHHHHH I didn't mean 1:1000 airport when you said I could do better I thought meant spelling my bad

You should have said that in the first place then.

LOT 737-300 · 10-30-2006, 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by United747

Well some people who want a fast airport with unlimited space proboly and a cheap price who don't care about quality.

Well if I had unlimited space, i'd be building a massive display in 1:500 and make it a partial hybrid in 1:400 as well.
But if you mean that I'd be able to build more in 1:1000. Yeah, thats the biggest upside. They're not that ugly might I add. They are actually quite good for something that small. If they get more popular, they might eventually become more detailed and match the current 1:500 scale models details.

United747 · 10-31-2006, 12:41 AM

I meant that people like 1:1000 because they could build a huge airport with unlimited space because they are so small. I didin't mean I would prove that I could prove to build a huge airport out of 1:1000.

n777co · 10-31-2006, 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by United747

I meant that people like 1:1000 because they could build a huge airport with unlimited space because they are so small. I didin't mean I would prove that I could prove to build a huge airport out of 1:1000.

Truthfully you should say what you mean the first time. (Then we won't get in to this hole mess)

a_loser · 10-31-2006, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by n777co

Truthfully you should say what you mean the first time. (Then we won't get in to this hole mess)

Yep - pick a side and stay with it; don't flip-flop between issues like "I'm gonna wait for DirectX 10" and "I'm not going to wait for DirectX 10" - people will take you much more seriously, and who knows - you might even get a little respect from us eventually

Rammstein · 10-31-2006, 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by a_loser

Yep - pick a side and stay with it; don't flip-flop between issues like "I'm gonna wait for DirectX 10" and "I'm not going to wait for DirectX 10" - people will take you much more seriously, and who knows - you might even get a little respect from us eventually

Yeah "eventually"

n777co · 10-31-2006, 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rammstein

Yeah "eventually"

How true

10-30-2006, 10:54 PM	#21
a_loser Air Wisconsin Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: WI Age: 30 Posts: 2,484	No no no, you're changing the subject (again) - I asked whether you can make a better 1:1000 display, and you said yes you can. Now I'm requesting that you prove it. __________________ -Kevin CEO, Nice Airports, Inc. You'll find me at Trains N Planes - you can be there too if you'd like.

10-31-2006, 12:41 AM	#26
United747 Second Officer Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 652	I meant that people like 1:1000 because they could build a huge airport with unlimited space because they are so small. I didin't mean I would prove that I could prove to build a huge airport out of 1:1000. __________________ My Airport site www.freewebs.com/unitedguy123 My wishlist United A320 (grey colors) GJ United 747-400 (grey colors) AC United A319 (grey colors) GJ American MD-82 GJ

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread: